 |
|
HMS Charybdis
HMS Limbourne wreck Reports and findings
by Leigh Bishop
Back to Operation
Tunnel Home link
Click
here for HMS Limbourne findings
'HMS
Charybdis'
The following
text reports on the condition of the wreck of HMS Charybdis following
an expedition to the site from the 9th to the 13th of June 2001.
The all-British expedition to the wreck was led by London based
Keith Morris and included 6 other specialised technical divers.
The divers were experienced mixed gas divers and took the opportunity
to explore the wreck and take notes with the very latest in technological
advances in open circuit scuba. These particular following notes
by observation and deep close up photography were complied by team
member Leigh Bishop during the dives undertaken on the wreck during
the above-mentioned expedition.
~It must be said that to date the divers mentioned above were unable
to take a full and complete analysis of the site due to the limited
time available during the expedition. Therefore these are most up
to date facts as the present time allows. These notes are complied
also from my questioning of other divers immediately on their arrival
at the surface.
Quite clearly taking in the circumstances of loses the wreck of
'HMS Charybdis' today remains on the seabed of the English Channel
in remarkable condition. Other than extensive damage to the forward
Starboard Hull and a small break aft of her second and aftermost
mast her main superstructure shape remains intact and readily recognisable.
Swimming across the wreck site reveals numerous objects of interest
and significant importance. The wreck lies across the tide north
to south with her bow at the far northern end of the site, she is
completely over to her port side in position 49º00'42N / 003º35'95W
over a gravel seabed at a depth of 83meters of seawater. The very
bow tip appears intact and her starboard admiralty anchor can clearly
be seen still housed within its hawser, as it would have obviously
been when in action at the time of lose. From here and only a few
meters aft of the anchor the wreck shows obvious damage, damage
which is mainly located to the starboard hull forward of the bridge
location. Swimming towards the stern across such wreckage becomes
confusing at first and guides the diver to deeper and broken open
sections of the wreck were a variety of internal fittings could
be seen. For example it is within this area that toilets complete
and intact can be seen within the wreck although broken free from
their original fixings. All manor of electrical fittings can be
seen including switchboxes and fuse boards much with heavy electrical
cable loose and else ware tangled. Not to mention pipefittings flanges
heavy structural framework etc. Again within the same area noted
are numerous heavy-duty portholes complete with deadlights, which
all appear securely fixed shut and bolted at their dogs. The damaged
area here extends perhaps as much as 15-18 meters in length although
does not appear as deep into the keel line with remaining hull still
intact to a small degree over to the starboard seabed.
Swimming
along the seabed from the anchor one is immediately met by the remains
of (but only small) sections of safety rail that would have conformed
the very bow rail. As the diver swims aft approx 6m the rail disappears
within the seabed wreckage as well as under the port hull. Quite
possibly the reason it is readily recognisable at the very bow is
the fact that the hull under the port side draws upward to the bow
tip. Looking up the bow foredeck itself looks intact and from my
observations possibly wooded clad? One is then immediately confronted
by the first gun, what would have been the very foredeck double
4.5-inch gun turret. The turret itself has fallen from its mount
due to its own weight thus resting on the seabed although both gun
barrels now point out towards the port seabed. Neither rest on the
seabed itself. From here to the bridge the wreck once again becomes
a little confusing in that a degree of collapse and debris that
forms part of the starboard hull damage has infact spread across
the deck. Basically I believe the deck here has damage which in
turn peters out to the starboard damage down and thus to seabed
level. It is here that the second gun will be located again with
gun barrels intact. Having said that the wreck once again picks
up rapidly before the bridge is confronted. The bridge still remains
fairly intact mainly due to its original built strength and structure
design and lies within its boxed shape. The diver here is forced
to swim out further across the port seabed, which the bridge now
lies across. There is no space under the bridge, which lies totally
to the gravel seabed level. At the very front several sections of
plate appear to have fallen free perhaps from what looks like corrosion
although the main superstructure framework has certainly worn well
and remains steadily intact. The starboard side of the bridge does
however appear slumped again perhaps due to its own weight. From
the immediate bow to the front of the bridge no such bell became
obvious although was searched for to a small degree. Continuing
along the port seabed the diver is then confronted by a large spotting
light approx 4-5 ft across in diameter which has almost certainly
fallen from its mounting Gimble which lies directly behind and attached
to the main wreckage. Running out across the port seabed here lays
the main mast framework and becomes obvious with a small ladder
running the length of it.
The
mast disappears into the darkness and was not followed completely).
Above here as the diver works their way up and across the wreckage
several notable fuse boxes are obvious as is a section of wreckage
displaying a tiled flooring arrangement? Above here and again at
a higher but shallower depth of the wreck at least two water tight
doors become apparent. Above here still further is what looks to
be a small launch craft prop and shaft? To its immediate right and
swimming aft the diver is confronted by a large amount of shell
cases. Infact shell cases can be seen in a variety of locations
around the wreck as would be expected. Swimming on from the mast
aft towards the stern is what is believed to be a pompom gun, which
now lies to the port side seabed. A short swim aft of amidships
the wreck becomes broken quite possibly as a result of seabed impact?
However having said this neither stern or bow show any such signs
of seabed impact damage as such. Mr Ovenden's side scan observations
clearly show this break and taking into consideration neither end
shows impact damage this break in the back of the wreck could possibly
been a result of attack on what could only be described as the prominently
weak design point of the wreck. Only further investigation would
reveal such suggestions. Again her stern mast can be seen clearly
lying across the seabed out to port with a small ladder running
along the aftermost side. As previously described there was no obvious
damage to the very stern. At first this section of the wreck was
confusing, as the stern itself came to an immediate point not unlike
that of the very bow tip itself. On this occasion the props were
not inspected. Neither funnel was seen quite possibly collapsed
in the flood tide not long after sinking and thus dispersed due
to the thin construction.
Leigh Bishop June 2001
HMS Limbourne
wreck Reports and findings 2002
By
the end of the expedition we had built up from both diving and video
communication the exact layout of the vessel. From the sonar side
scan images created by Ovenden & Haslam it appeared that a section
of wreck lie a distance away from the remaining hull. We had determined
that both bow and stern were indefinitely missing from the main
midships and in theory the bow must lie elsewhere blown off by the
Germans. As I described earlier we had already investigated a stern
section of wreck, which must explain the section that lie a distance
away, we had to find out. Chris Hutchison made it his mission to
do so and would film as he went. From information taken from the
side scan images he therefore set out alone on a bearing of 210º
from a predetermined point on the wreck swimming out along the seabed
at a depth of 83m in search of the missing wreckage.
His film shows a seabed littered with shell cases as he makes his
way into the darkness. Ovenden & Haslam's bearing information
was accurate and soon the missing section looms out of the darkness
to confront Chris with the stern section of Limbourne and that 3
bladed offset prop and typical counter stern he Parker & Bullen
had seen on that first initial check out dive. This broken away
stern section was only small in comparison to the remaining wreckage
and lies parallel to it, her intact 4inch twin gun turret barrels
facing west. Of the remaining main section the divers filmed and
photographed a war ship of what once was, her twin torpedo-launching
turret remains intact with torpedoes still inside.
This entire platform sited on top of the midships once rotated either
port or starboard to launch torpedos from high above the water line,
we found her housed in her home position. Beyond here towards the
bow a Quadruple 2pdr anti aircraft gun system with a stack of ready
ammunition by its side made a somewhat Truk lagoon atmosphere to
the whole affair. This gun commonly known as a 'pom pom' gun had
a rate of fire of up to 115 rounds per minute, firing a 40mm round
to a maximum ceiling of 13,000ft. Both sections of Limbourne we
examined lay across the tide with her bow facing west-northwest
some 280º only five miles from Charybdis and considerably close
to the 'Les Sept Isles'. Her position will hopefully remain undisclosed
for a good number of years to come leaving her to once again rest
in peace.
Leigh Bishop
July 2002

More about technical diving click
here >>
Learn how to become a technical diver with the best training click
here >>
About Deep Blue diving technical diving instructors click
here >> |
 |